Numbers 3:39

Vulgate⁽ⁱ⁾ ³⁹ omnes Levitae quos numeraverunt Moses et Aaron iuxta praeceptum Domini per familias suas in genere masculino a mense uno et supra fuerunt viginti duo milia

Online Parallel Study Bible

Parallel Bible

Advanced Bible Search

Books of the Bible

Compare Numbers 3:39 in other Bible versions

Numbers 3:39 Cross References - Vulgate

Ask a question about Numbers 3:39

Select another Bible version to view Numbers 3:39 in

Popular Versions

Literal Translations

Interlinears

Easy to Read

Modernized KJV

Early Modern English

Strong's Numbers

Septuagint

Greek

Hebrew

Latin

Deutsch

Nederlands

Français

Español

汉语

Other English Versions

Other Languages

Treasury of Scripture Knowledge

and Aaron.The word [w'hrn,] {we\u65533 haron,} and "Aaron," has a point over each of its letters, probably designed as a mark of spuriousness. The word is wanting in the Samaritan, Syriac, and Coptic, and also in eight of Dr. Kennicott's and in four of De Rossi's MSS. Moses alone, as Houbigant observes, was commanded to number the Levites, (ver. 5, 11, 40, 44, 51:) for as the money with which the first-born were redeemed was to be paid to Aaron and his sons, (ver. 48,) it was decent that he, whose advantage it was that the number of the first-born should exceed, should not be authorized to take that number himself. twenty and two thousand. This total does not agree with the particulars; for the Gershonites were 7,500, the Kohathites 8,600, and the Merarites 6,200, which make a total of 22,300. Several methods of solving this difficulty have been proposed by learned men. Houbigant supposes there is an error in the enumeration of the Kohathites in ver. 28; the numeral {shesh,} "six," being written instead of {shalosh,} "three," before "hundred." Dr. Kennicott's mode of reconciling the discrepancy, however, is the most simple. He supposes that an error has crept into the number of the Gershonites in ver. 22, where instead of 7,500 we should read 7,200, as [k,] {caph} final, which stands for 500, might have been easily mistaken for [r,] resh, 200. (Dr. Kennicott on the Hebrew Text, vol. II. p. 212.) Either of these modes will equally reconcile the difference.
Numbers 4:47; Numbers 4:48; Numbers 26:62; Matthew 7:14